November 1959 Tilley X359

Discussion in 'X359' started by Matthew92, Dec 15, 2016.

  1. Matthew92

    Matthew92 Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2012
    Messages:
    2,056
    Here's an X359 I picked up a while ago, I think I'm lucky because I managed to get one with a fully functioning preheater. :D/ The lamp does also have quite a lean to one side as well, the first picture may be exaggerating it slightly, but it is there due to misalignment of parts during manufacture.

    1481804921-IMG_3071.JPG

    1481804932-IMG_3072.JPG 1481804944-IMG_3073.JPG 1481804956-IMG_3074.JPG
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 1, 2017
  2. Tony Press

    Tony Press Australia Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2012
    Messages:
    9,632
    Location:
    Stinkpot Bay, Howden, Tasmania, Australia
    Matthew

    Does that misalignment mean that the vapouriser, preheater and suds are all off centre?

    Tony
     
  3. Matthew92

    Matthew92 Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2012
    Messages:
    2,056
    Hi Tony, it's difficult to see if all of the parts are off centre, but the most obvious is seen in the 3rd picture above. If you look at the top of the tank you can see a stamped contour where the boss for the control cock is soldered. The boss is not centre of the contour and the contour is not stamped squarely in the tank. I'm not sure if this is due to manufacturing fault or if it was done intentionally to offset the vapouriser in the glass so there was room for the preheater. I assume the studs and cage are offset aswell so that the hood sits properly when mounted on the vapouriser.
     
  4. Matthew92

    Matthew92 Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2012
    Messages:
    2,056
    Here's a video I took of lighting this lamp with the built in pre-heater.

     
  5. JEFF JOHNSON

    JEFF JOHNSON United Kingdom Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2010
    Messages:
    15,042
    Location:
    Shetland Islands UK..
    A lucky find!:thumbup:
     
  6. Anthony

    Anthony Australia Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    May 7, 2013
    Messages:
    1,509
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia
    Great job Matthew.
    That is the first time I have seen a 359 pre-heater work and that not only works but works very well.
    Even the glass is still spotless.
    Thanks for you efforts.
     
  7. pete sav

    pete sav Founder Member

    Offline
    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2010
    Messages:
    1,027
    nice lamp matt I liked the video too I have never seen one of these in action
    I must say it looks very efficient or maybe its your skill at using the heater great post matt
    pete
     
  8. Matthew92

    Matthew92 Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2012
    Messages:
    2,056
    Thanks @JEFF JOHNSON and @Anthony I took the video a while ago, but thought I'd wait for this new forum platform so I could put the video directly into this thread. I know these pre-heaters have mixed results, so when mine worked so well, I thought it would be nice for other to see it in action. I doubt it'll get used too much though, as I don't want to damage it.

    Thanks @pete sav I haven't worked out how long it needs to heat the burner fully, it may not have needed as much as I gave it, but I didn't want a flare up on camera.:lol:
     
  9. pete sav

    pete sav Founder Member

    Offline
    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2010
    Messages:
    1,027
    Hi matt preheat time is 1 minute in the tilley instruction leaflet but better more than risk flare ups
    pete
     
  10. Dean D

    Dean D Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    May 21, 2017
    Messages:
    171
    Location:
    Minnesota USA
    I just got a 359 myself, cannot wait to see it running.
    20190624_145150.jpg
     
  11. AussiePete

    AussiePete United States Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2015
    Messages:
    3,643
    Location:
    Toowoomba Australia
    Looks like they’re out there. After seeing Matthews X359 preheater running I just gotta get mine running.
    Should be an experience.
    Cheers
    Pete
     

Share This Page