1938 Aladdin-Petromax 828

Discussion in 'Lanterns' started by Martin K., Feb 28, 2014.

  1. Martin K.

    Martin K. Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2013
    Messages:
    1,148
    Hi!
    This is my newest item, yet unrestored. It is a Aladdin-Petromax 828 rated 300CP. The scratched numbers on the tank bottom say "9 3", so I assume that it could be of March 1939.
    This lantern seems to be very remarkable for Petromax because it has a kinked lower part of the vaporizer (826 style), but employs a positive shutoff fuel valve driven together with the pricker excenter. This is necessary to allow the usage of the rapid preheater. Common 828 and 829 models have a straight vaporizer with the spring loaded fuel valve on its lower end. As usual there is no meths cup for preheating.
    1393587968-02280001b.jpg
    Unfortunately the nickel plating is almost gone, but no dents nor stress cracks at all.
    1393587990-02280002b.jpg 1393588002-02280003b.jpg 1393588012-02280004b.jpg
    The control handle is unusual compared to other Petromax types, due to its extended functionality.
    1393588025-02280005b.jpg 1393588037-02280006b.jpg
    The manometer on the filler cap is stamped "Petromax D.R.P."
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 1, 2017
  2. karli

    karli Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2011
    Messages:
    677
    At English Alladin Petromax types I have seen this handwheel several times.
     
  3. Claus C

    Offline
    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2012
    Messages:
    1,787
    Nice find Martin, very nice. :thumbup: Looks unusual to me everywhere - me like.

    Claus C
     
  4. Martin K.

    Martin K. Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2013
    Messages:
    1,148
    Hi again,

    here are some new photos of the lantern after a good cleanup of all functional parts and replacement of all seals/gaskets. I decided to leave the patina as is. It is now running well and shows no problems at all.
    1393851509-03030001a.jpg 1393851522-03030002a.jpg 1393851534-03030007a.jpg
    According to another post of Claus C I now think that the manufacturing date for this thread should be changed. I read "9 3" instead of "9 8" in mistake, thus interpreting the wrong order of numbers. With the correction the manufacturing date would not be March 1939, but September 1938.

    BR, Martin
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 1, 2017

Share This Page