Floodlamp …

Discussion in 'Lamp Action Gallery' started by presscall, Jan 30, 2026 at 7:26 PM.

  1. presscall

    presscall United Kingdom Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2011
    Messages:
    1,747
    Location:
    Lancashire, UK
    IMG_4587.jpeg


    … ok, it’s a propane one

    IMG_4586.jpeg


    One of my Tilley FL6’s may well end up on that hefty steel tripod though, extending to 7 feet.

    IMG_4594.jpeg

    IMG_4593.jpeg

    John
     
  2. gkpllantern

    gkpllantern Japan Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2011
    Messages:
    53
    Location:
    Chiba, Japan
    @presscall

    I’ve never seen a propane-fueled floodlamp before.
    It looks incredibly bright.
    How does its fuel consumption compare with kerosene — is it less efficient?

    Shinzo
     
  3. presscall

    presscall United Kingdom Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2011
    Messages:
    1,747
    Location:
    Lancashire, UK
    @gkpllantern
    The propane floodlamp’s brightness is determined by the efficiency of the reflector and the light output of the mantle, which is no greater than if made luminous by kerosene or naptha vapour.

    In terms of fuel consumption, I have a catalogue from 1983 featuring the floodlamp (called ‘Autoflood’ in it because of the easy lighting feature using a piezo spark generator).

    IMG_4595.jpeg


    The propane consumption for the Autoflood is given as 106 grammes per hour.

    IMG_4596.jpeg


    I’m using a Calor gas cylinder containing 6 kilos of propane, so at the quoted hourly rate of consumption I could run the floodlamp for 56 hours continuously. Exchanging the empty cylinder for a full one, I pay for just the gas - £32 (6,778 JPY). I’m unable to give a comparison, but that compares very favourably with the cost of running a FL6, even more so in the case of a naptha-fuelled lamp.

    John
     

Share This Page